Scott Yandell claims to be an expert in information technology who takes great pride in his work. Scott Yandell asserts he is passionate about technology and delights in using the most recent tools and equipment available.
You can help us put a stop to online scams before they grow too big and end up ruining thousands of lives. A scam is a scam, doesn’t matter if it’s big or small. Now that this is out of the way, let’s get started with the review.
Being self-absorbed and proud Scott Yandell claims that his genuine interest in his profession and the urge to offer his clients the best information technology solutions the IT industry has to offer motivate him to keep current to advance his career.
Scott Yandell flaunts the efforts made towards his work by making a concerted effort to excel in his area and always puts out his best effort while consulting with businesses of all sizes.
Scott Yandell claims to be charitable and a pet lover, he claims that he is an animal enthusiast and activist. Flaunting himself to be a zoophile, Scott Yandell alleges to be a strong proponent of protecting wildlife and preserving their natural habitats. Scott shows off being a socialistic and charitable person by mentioning on media platforms that by raising awareness and trying to improve residents’ understanding of caring for pets and wildlife, Yandell supports neighborhood shelters.
He should not showcase being charitable as charity should not be considered a piece of a showpiece. Flaunting himself to be a family-oriented person, Yandell claims that he works in an office setting, but also values spending his free time outdoors and feels that taking care of animals is a duty that everyone should share.
We look at 34 different data points when analyzing and rating online money-earning opportunities. Once the research on these data points is submitted, expert contributors reach out to the company’s customers and associates to get more insight into their operation. Finally, all the collected information is presented in the form of this expert review.
All the data is extracted from publicly available information and the sources are given in the transparency section at the bottom of every report.
These reports are made possible by the collective efforts of contributors like you. If you would like to become a contributor then contact us here.
Scott Yandell- A lawsuit charging a lawyer of racketeering has been filed after he claimed that cultivating marijuana was permitted.
A lawsuit accusing a local attorney of profiting from crimes has been filed against him after Scott Yandell assured clients they could lawfully grow marijuana despite federal law declaring the reverse.
According to Scott Yandell and Marsha Yandell’s lawsuit, Ian Christensen’s law company advised couples like the Yandells that if they required marijuana for a medical condition, Scott Yandell could obtain a doctor’s note that would shield them from prosecution.
Scott Yandell and his wife were charged with producing, possessing with intent to sell, and trafficking marijuana in St. Johns County in 2015 after Christensen informed them that it was allowed to use marijuana. In the end, they settled and consented to a $15,000 fine, three years of probation, and 100 hours of community service. Marsha Yandell’s nursing license was also revoked. They currently reside in Oregon, a state that has legalized marijuana.
The Yandells and other former clients of Christensen have also filed complaints with the Florida Bar. However, his law firm’s website specifically states that “if a patient can prove to a law enforcement officer that cannabis is the safest medication available to treat their diagnosed condition, they are NOT subject to arrest.” He claimed in his written response to the complaint that he told the Yandells that the certification could only be used as a defense after arrest. However, this is untrue.
The accusations against Christensen were judged to have probable cause by a grievance committee, and the Florida Supreme Court is currently considering them.
Christensen refuted the allegations made in the complaint, asserting that he did not make money from his business and that he always informed clients of the possibility of imprisonment. Although there were many occasions when they were not arrested, I never told people they couldn’t be.
Christensen rejected a constitutional amendment to legalize medical marijuana in 2014 because it was already lawful to cultivate and use marijuana. Even as people were being detained for marijuana cultivation and use, he argued this.
According to available records, Christensen even spoke with the Florida Sheriff’s Association about his unusual interpretation of the law and cited a successful appeal case involving medical necessity. The Florida Sheriff’s Association informed him that the circumstances surrounding that case were “highly unusual” and “factually unique.”
The “medical necessity” justification originates from a case where marijuana helped a couple who were suffering from acute AIDS-related sickness. The couple’s convictions for marijuana cultivation and possession of drug paraphernalia were reversed by an appellate court. The state Supreme Court maintained the decision’s three conditions, which still apply to a “medical necessity” defense.
Defendants must demonstrate three things: that they did not cause their medical need, such as by shooting themselves; that they were unable to employ a “less offensive alternative;” and that “the evil sought to be avoided was more heinous than the unlawful act perpetrated to avoid it.”
As opposed to what the Yandells claimed Christensen taught them, none of those arguments can be used before an arrest.
Christensen is charged with racketeering, or routinely making money off of criminal behavior, in the Yandells’ complaint.
His business charged $800 for a license to cultivate and use marijuana for customers like the Yandells. He connected the Yandells with Chaksau Sharma, a first-year North Dakota resident who did not possess a Florida medical license but whom Christensen yet referred to as a doctor. Christopher Ralph, who the firm listed as a member of the American Bar Association, was also employed by Christensen’s law practice. The lawsuit claims that Ralph didn’t hold a law degree or even a bachelor’s degree. Ralph claimed on Monday that he was a member up until December 2014, despite the American Bar Association stating in 2015 that he was not. According to the lawsuit, Ralph described himself as a lawyer from Washington, D.C.
Ralph referred to the lawsuit as a “conspiracy” that is “just nuts,” and he claimed that the Yandells were detained even though they had a patient ID card from the company and claimed to need the marijuana for medical purposes. He claimed that if they had indeed needed marijuana for medical purposes, they would not have been detained. “People should merely be aware that every story has two sides, including this one. People who have a genuine medical need for something shouldn’t be impacted by one person’s criminal actions.
Marsha Yandell claimed to have fibromyalgia. They claimed to have felt so strongly about the work Christensen was doing that they even paid for another person’s certification because they weren’t able to pay for it themselves.
Christensen and the police who arrested him, according to Scott Yandell, are both causing him frustration. “I stated that I was a patient, but it didn’t matter to them; they treated us like criminals. Nothing happened as Chris and Ian predicted. He claimed he doesn’t understand why Christensen hasn’t been detained by the authorities for claiming that medical marijuana is lawful.
According to Andrew Bonderud, the Yandells’ new counsel, Christensen preyed on ailing people seeking hope.
It sounded like he started with good and pure intentions, but amid their advocacy, they started abusing the trust of the clients and using people like the Yandells as guinea pigs to see what would happen. Let’s take this medical necessity idea and give it a run.”
Instead, Bonderud said, Christensen should’ve told people who felt they needed medical marijuana to just move to Colorado.
Scott Yandell- Types of Florida Drug Charges (The same crime committed by Scott Yandell)
- Possession to Disperse
A person may be charged with drug possession alone or with possession with the intent to distribute. The quantity of narcotics that the person is found in possession of is what distinguishes the two offenses.
Drug possession charges come when law enforcement discovers a small quantity of narcotics on a person, most often for personal use. However, if they find more, they might assume that the person was planning to sell the drugs. To determine whether you had the narcotics with the intention of selling them, the police will also check to see if you had scales, tiny baggies, or cash wrapped in a specific way.
Charges for distribution are comparable to those for drug trafficking, with the amount or weight of the narcotics in question serving as a key differentiator.
Charges for trafficking illegal narcotics rise from distribution when authorities discover them in quantities or weights above a specific threshold. The accused trafficker can also be charged on a federal level if the alleged trafficking entailed crossing state borders or importing or exporting to another nation.
- Possession of Marijuana Accessories
Drug accessories can be used to use, hide, or create illegal narcotics. The following are typical examples of drug paraphernalia:
- Baggies Scales
- pipes or bongs
- tiny spoons
- Syringes
Even if there are no drugs present, it is prohibited to possess any drug paraphernalia, and doing so could lead to criminal penalties.
- Manufacturing or Delivery
In Florida, aside from possessing drugs, it’s also illegal to manufacture or deliver illicit substances.
Manufacturing entails producing drugs or other products used to make illegal substances. Drug delivery is similar to drug distribution, as an offender delivers illegal substances, usually for sale.
Scott Yandell– Florida’s Drug Offense Penalties
Florida’s drug charges penalties vary depending on several elements, including the crime’s nature.
Misdemeanors and felonies are two different categories of crimes. While felonies are more serious and can carry harsh consequences, misdemeanors are seen as less serious offenses.
- First-Degree Misdemeanor
In Florida, a first-degree misdemeanor carries a maximum sentence of one year in prison and fines of $1,000. For instance, in Florida, a charge of narcotics possession involving less than 20 grams of marijuana would be considered a first-degree misdemeanor. Charges related to drug paraphernalia can potentially be first-degree misdemeanors.
- First-Degree Felony
The most serious felonies are those in the first degree, and they come with the worst punishments. Possession of more than 10 grams of a Schedule I or II drug or selling drugs within a mile of a school or park are examples of first-degree felonies related to drugs in Florida. Charges of drug trafficking in Florida are also considered first-degree felonies. Mandatory jail penalties of three to 25 years are imposed for the offense, depending on the kind and quantity of drugs involved. First-degree offenses typically carry fines and prison terms that can reach $10,000.
- Second-degree Felony
Possession of chemicals used to create specific types of illegal narcotics, such as ecstasy, as well as possession with the intent to distribute would often be considered second-degree felonies.
Second-degree misdemeanors can result in fines of up to $10,000 and jail terms of up to 15 years.
- Third-Division Felony
An individual may be charged with a third-degree felony if they are accused of possessing drugs that are over a specific weight. Typical substances that constitute a third-degree crime include
- Less than 28 grams of cocaine
- Cannabis: twenty grams or more
- Methamphetamine: 14 grams or less
- Less than four grams of heroin
- Any quantity without a prescription of Xanax
Third-degree crimes are the least serious kind of felony in Florida. Penalties for them include fines of up to $5,000 or prison sentences of up to five years.
Scott Yandell– Why do you want to stop using drugs?
There is never a bad time to stop using drugs.
You can significantly enhance your life by cutting back on or quitting medications. It can:
- Enhance your emotional and physical health.
- Lower your chance of death and lasting organ damage Improve your connections with family and friends.
- Reconnect with your emotions.
- Improve your sleep, give you more energy, and make you look better while saving you money.
Although it may take some time, drug-free addicts claim they have never felt better. Knowing why you want to stop using drugs can keep you motivated while going through withdrawal.
Wrap-Up with How to Combat Drug Addiction? (Addiction to drugs can be the second step to the crime committed by Scott Yandell)
- Be in the company of encouraging individuals. Finding sober companions is one of the most crucial things you can do to stay sober. Even while it could be difficult to end harmful relationships from your past, spending time with others who understand your need to be sober will be beneficial in the long term.
- Find new interests. The easiest method to keep your mind off your temptation to use is to keep occupied. In addition, developing an exciting and fulfilling pastime can help you replace your old, harmful habits with new, drug-free ones and give your life joy and meaning.
- Exercise. Exercise benefits both the body and the mind. You’ll enjoy the “natural high” of endorphins as your physical health improves, which might enhance your mood. Additionally, having a daily exercise regimen gives your day structure and lowers your risk of relapsing.
- Volunteer. While in recovery, finding a worthwhile cause to support enables you to assist others while assisting yourself. You can find a sense of purpose by giving back to the community, creating strong relationships and friendships, and feeling proud of the contributions you’re making to society.
- Eat sensibly. Your overall health is significantly impacted by the food you eat.
- Talk it over. You may occasionally need to chat with someone about how your recovery is progressing. Sharing your views with someone who can assist you through the tough times and can relate to your experiences is vital.
- Meditate. Mindfulness exercises have been shown to lower blood pressure, boost the immune system, and relieve stress and anxiety.
- Look for expert assistance. It’s okay to seek further medical assistance when necessary because recovering from drug addiction is difficult. With structured programs that offer a secure approach to avoid relapses and maintain recovery, medical professionals and behavioral therapists can position you for success.
